This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brakensiek, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Political Judgement between Empirical Experience and Scholarly Tradition: Engelbert Kaempfer's Report on Persia (1684-85)

Fakultät für Geschichtswissenschaft und Philosophie, University of Bielefeld, Universitärsstr. 25. D-33615 Bielefeld, Germany

The article attempts a reconstruction of the ways in which the pro duction of knowledge about Persia was organised by Engelbert Kaempfer in his writings. This late seventeenth century German traveller to Asia has been unfailingly commended for his critical empiricism. While this has been taken for granted in thefield of natural sciences—Kaempfer was a famous physician and botanist—it is more difficult, when searching for the foundations of his judgement about the political system of Persia, to distinguish between experience and scholarly tradition. The article provides a survey of the information Kaempfer had to rely upon. A comparison between these sources and the report itself gives us some insight into the processes through which the production of socio-political knowledge about an alien world took place and how the encounter with the alien exercised an influence on the political judgement of a seventeenth century explorer.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?